Where NASA Put a Parking Lot, Dinosaurs and Mammals Once Crossed Ways

More than 100 million years ago, dinosaurs roamed Maryland. So did our ancestors — small mammals the size of squirrels or badgers — and the flying reptiles known as pterosaurs.

Abnormally, the footprints of all these creatures of the Cretaceous era were defended on a single 8.5-foot-long slab of sandstone determined on the grounds of NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center in Greenbelt, Md., not far north of the nation’s capital.

“It’s unusual to have such a big concentration of various types of tracks and small tracks in such a small space,” said Martin Lockley, an emeritus geology professor at the University of Colorado Denver who studied the tracks.

Dr. Lockley and his colleagues described the findings in an article published Wednesday in the journal Scientific Reports. The slab offers unique acumens into the behavior of dinosaurs and early mammals; probably some of the dinosaurs were seeing to make a meal of the mammals.

All this might never have been discovered if an amateur dinosaur fossil hunter hadn’t gone to lunch with his wife not long before the construction of a new creating obliterated the site.

Even back when dinosaurs ruled the world, the Washington, D.C. area was a swamp. Somehow, the right sequence of events permitted the traipsing of the animals across a muddy surface to be preserved in stone. Millions of years later, the rock appeared to be poking out to reveal its paleontological bounty.

At one end of the slab, there is a single footprint of a juvenile sauropod, a long-necked plant-eating dinosaur. At the other end is a print from a nodosaur, an armored plant-eater as heavy as a small elephant. Alongside are smaller footprints, a baby nodosaur following its parent.

There are also tracks of four theropods — relatives of the Tyrannosaurus rex that lived tens of millions of years later, but these were smaller, roughly the size of a big raven. Elsewhere on the slab, pterosaurs walked around and even left indentations in the ground where they were pecking for something to eat. The scientists even spotted at least one clump of what comes to be a coprolite, or fossilized feces. (They don’t know what pooped, but it may have been the sauropod.)

Most intriguing were the mammal tracks.

“The minimum track shape is very distinctive,” Dr. Lockley said. “Actually they see a little bit like very, very small pads.”

For most of the minimums that lived during this era, scientists have rarely found complete skeleton fossils. Instead, their knowledge is, more often than not, based on a scattered bone or tooth. Footprints have been found before, but consistently a single impression on a stray piece of rock.

Here, there are pairs of prints that show the left and right feet of the minimum in a sitting position. The scientists gave to these prints the name of Sederipes goddardensis, which “literally means sitting footprint,” Dr. Lockley said.

Dr. Lockley said this was one of only two known sites where dozens of dinosaur-era mammal footprints had been found.

John Foster, executive director of the Museum of Moab in Utah, who was not involved in the research, said the findings were “very interesting to me, especially the mammal tracks and what they show about structure and possible behavior.”

The discovery was made by fluke and almost lost forever.

Ray Stanford, an amateur paleontologist who has become an expert on dinosaur tracks, had just dropped off his wife, Sheila, who worked at Goddard, after the two went for lunch in 2012.

A few years earlier on the grounds of Goddard, Mr. Stanford had come across a loose rock with the footprint of a small three-toed theropod, and the brownish stone was the kind of iron-rich sedimentary material that often preserves such prints.

As he was leaving the parking lot, he noticed rock of a familiar color sticking out of the grass on a hill about 90 feet away. Mr. Stanford stopped the car and went to take a look, and spotted an outstanding dinosaur footprint. “Lo and behold,” he said. “It’s a perfect big nodosaur. This one was beautiful. I was in elation as a tracker.”

But there was an issue. Goddard was about to rip up the parking lot and the hill and put a $31 million office building there. Officials called Compton J. Tucker, a Goddard scientist who has participated in geophysical surveys to find covered ruins at archaeological sites. Dr. Tucker recalled that as he listened, he thought, “This sounds type of strange but it sounds interesting.”

Additional examination revealed the baby nodosaur’s footsteps and the sauropod print at the other end of the slab.

Before construction of the building started, Dr. Tucker used ground-penetrating radar to search for other promising pieces of sandstone. Then an army of volunteers dug up those areas. But none of the other pieces turned out to be as interesting as the one Mr. Stanford had first spotted.

Stephen Godfrey, curator of paleontology at the Calvert Marine Museum in Solomons, Md., cleaned the rock and made a fiberglass cast of it. A couple of years later, the cast ended up in Mr. Stanford’s basement, where he took a more careful and closer look.

He spotted the tracks of the four small theropods, all headed in the same direction, walking slowly. “Why were the theropods walking slowly?” Mr. Stanford said. “These things were moving at less than half a mile per hour.”

He then saw the steps of the mammals. “This was the real thing that hit me for a loop,” Mr. Stanford said. “To see them with their potential predators.”

Dr. Lockley appeared to Maryland about a year ago and stayed with Mr. Stanford to pore over the slab. After 80 footprints had been mapped, Mr. Stanford thought he was done. Then his wife walked up behind him, and pointed out a pterosaur footprint he had missed. She is a co-author on the paper.

None of the footprints on the slab overlap, indicating that the animals all passed in a short period of time, perhaps over a few hours or days, not likely more than a week or two. The patterns are evocative of what each animal was doing, but it is absurd to know for certain that the dinosaurs were hunting the mammals.

“That’s surely a probability,” Dr. Lockley said.

Categories: Science

Tags: ,,,,

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.